[49] Why was it the custom for those canvassing for office to do so in the toga without the tunic, as Cato has recorded?[112]
Was it in order that they might not carry money in the folds of their tunic and give bribes?
Or was it rather because they used to judge candidates worthy of office, not by their family nor their wealth nor their repute, but by their wounds and scars? Accordingly that these might be visible to those that encountered them, they used to go down to their canvassing without tunics.
Or were they trying to commend themselves to popular favour by thus humiliating themselves by their scanty attire, even as they do by hand-shaking, personal appeals, and fawning behaviour?